Robert Wm. Gomez's

And Why Are You Telling Us This?

So, here we are post mid-term Republican take-over of the legislature. As one might expect, my Facebook feed been awash with bitter and angry lefty losers (Although it hasn't been quite as bad as I expected. I guess the election outcome was not much of a shock). Posts range from the typical "I don't know anyone who would have voted for these monsters" to expected sour-grapes cries of cheating, etc. Fortunately, there were none of the usual calls to violence and injury as I have seen in the past:

Sean Hannity Needs Cancer

Something came across my feed this morning that had me thinking, and when I start thinking it's usually a good idea fore me to log off of Facebook and take to my blog where my rants won't lose me friends (and won't be read by anybody). A friend of mine linked to an article about the CEO of ULINE and how he was the a big-time contributor to conservative candidates and causes across the state. He is, as the headline put it, "The Koch of conservative politics in Illinois."

As an aside, What's with the left and their continual need for boogeymen when advocating for their causes? These days Koch brothers are the anti-christ du jour. Had this article come out ten years ago it would reference Haliburton. Ten years before that, maybe Mark Furhman? I guess there exists a sort of transitive property in politics that makes any problem more dire simply by association. And before you cry partisan foul, I realize that Republicans can do this to... I remember ACORN... but I feel it is much more rampant on the left.

Anyhow, back to the matter at hand. This friend linked the article then proclaimed that, of course, he will no longer will buy anything from ULINE again. Now, I am all for using the pocketbook to express a political position. You think GMOs are bad, by all means buy your organic small-batch artisinal what-nots to your heart's content. But I don't quite understand what the end-game is here, especially since he felt fit to announce this to world via social media.

Let's just say everyone sees his post and decides never to satisfy their cardboard shipping needs at ULINE ever again. ULINE closes shop and all the workers, drivers and office drones there, regardless of their political convictions, are out of a job (something like 2000+ employees). I don't think that's the result anyone wants. Ok, if that's not what we're after, let's say the CEO is starting to feel the economic pressure of the boycott. Then what's he supposed to do, abandon his political convictions in favor of yours? That seems rather narcissistic. Why should everyone agree with you? As the old cliche goes, do you think you have a monopoly on the truth? Here in Chicago, if I only patronized the businesses of people I agreed with I would go hungry real fast (grocers are a secret Marxist cabal from what I hear).

I think what really burns me here is that the boycott is being called not because of the way the company runs its business, rather it's to punish one man over his political beliefs, and, in the process, punish tons of people who are just living their lives. Can't we just accept that people have different views? Don't be a fool, buy from the company that offers you the best product at the best price and use whatever money you saved to fund your pet political cause and don't let petty politics run your life.